Context
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Delhi has led to large-scale deletions, raising concerns about the verification process, possible wrongful exclusion and difficulties faced by certain sections of voters.
About SIR
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is an electoral-roll verification exercise undertaken by the Election Commission of India (ECI) to maintain an authentic and updated voter database.
Its objectives include:
- Removing duplicate, deceased, permanently shifted and ineligible entries.
- Verifying current voters against legacy electoral records.
- Updating residential status and establishing relevant voter linkages.
- Ensuring that eligible citizens remain included in the electoral roll.
Key Features of the Process
- Pre-SIR Mapping: Booth Level Officers (BLOs) conducted door-to-door mapping to connect current voters with historical electoral records and establish progeny or lineage linkages in accordance with the Citizenship Act framework.
- Enumeration: From 30 June to 17 August 2026, BLOs undertook household visits. Pre-filled enumeration forms and digital submissions were also used.
- Claims and Verification: Electors verified their details, submitted supporting evidence for lineage linkages and reported changes such as a shift in residence.
- Draft Roll Publication: The revised draft electoral rolls were published, allowing citizens to submit claims and objections.
Major Outcomes
- SIR-related deletions: Nearly 4.8 million names were removed, bringing the cited electoral-roll figure from 14.5 million to nearly 9 million.
- Pre-SIR deletions: Around 1.1 million names had already been removed between January 2025 and the beginning of SIR through the regular revision process.
- Overall electorate: The source separately cites a decline from around 15.6 million in January 2026 to nearly 9.8 million. This represents the broader electorate count rather than the SIR-specific roll comparison.
Major Challenges
- Exclusion of Migrants and Tenants: Frequent relocation by tenants, migrant families and informal workers can make them vulnerable to being incorrectly classified as permanently shifted.
- Gender-Related Difficulties: Married women may face difficulties when their names are removed from their natal electoral rolls and they have to establish linkages with records at their marital residence.
- Procedural Communication Gaps: Some individuals faced difficulties in submitting forms online, while inadequate information could make it harder for affected voters to understand or address problems in their applications.
Administrative and Digital Constraints: The exercise placed a heavy workload on BLOs. Problems with digital systems and concerns regarding remuneration further complicated implementation.
Way Forward
- Examine claims carefully: Every claim and objection should be assessed individually to minimise wrongful exclusion.
- Adopt tenant-sensitive verification: Procedures should account for citizens who frequently change residences.
- Strengthen BLO support: Better working conditions and adequate institutional support are needed for field-level verification.
- Improve digital systems: Reliable platforms can reduce difficulties in form submission and verification.
- Strengthen public communication: Information should be disseminated through television, radio and other accessible channels, along with clear mechanisms for grievance redressal.
Conclusion
The SIR process must balance electoral-roll accuracy with inclusive voter participation, ensuring that verification does not result in the exclusion of eligible citizens.
FAQs
- What is legacy electoral data?
It refers to earlier electoral-roll records used to verify present voter information and establish relevant linkages. - Why can frequent relocation create difficulties during SIR?
People who change residences frequently may be incorrectly treated as having permanently shifted, creating a risk of erroneous deletion. - What is progeny or lineage mapping?
It involves establishing a link between a present voter and relevant historical electoral records through lineage-based evidence. - Why are claims and objections important?
They provide affected citizens an opportunity to challenge an electoral-roll decision and seek correction through the prescribed process. - Why is the role of BLOs important in SIR?
BLOs undertake much of the field-level verification, making adequate manpower and administrative support important for accurate implementation. - Why does digital accessibility matter in electoral-roll revision?
Reliable digital systems can make submission and verification easier, while technical problems may create additional barriers for voters.


