1. Free English Booklet

2. Free Current Affairs Total (CAT)

3. Register for Upcoming Batch on 2-06-2025 Last 3 Seats

7900-44-7900

ensureias@gmail.com

Assam Government's Decision to Arm Civilians

Assam Government's Decision to Arm Civilians

02-06-2025
  1. Recently, Assam government's recent decision to issue arms licenses to "eligible" indigenous communities in remote and vulnerable areas has highlighted significant debate.
  2. This is also raising concerns about law enforcement and security implications.
     

I. The Decision and its Stated Rationale

  1. Decision: The Assam government plans to issue arms licenses to "eligible" indigenous communities residing in remote and vulnerable areas, particularly those bordering Bangladesh.

  2. Chief Minister has clarified that these grants would not be for communities near inter-state borders within Assam.
  3. Stated Rationale: The government suggests this measure will:
    1. Act as a deterrent against perceived threats.
    2. Improve personal safety and confidence among these communities.

II. Critical Concerns and Risks Highlighted

The decision is viewed by critics as "fraught with danger" and going against established principles of law enforcement:

  1. Blurring Lines of Authority:
    1. Monopoly of Force: In modern states, the government and its law enforcement agencies (police, armed forces) hold the sole monopoly over instruments of violence.
    2. Abdication of Responsibility: Arming civilians, ostensibly for self-defence, is seen as the state abdicating its core responsibility of ensuring security through its own enforcement mechanisms.
    3. Vigilantism & Misuse: This blurring of lines risks rampant misuse of arms for:
      • Vigilantism: Private citizens taking law into their own hands.
      • Inter-community Rivalry: Exacerbating existing tensions or creating new ones.
  2. Arms Proliferation and Increased Violence:
    1. Assam has a history of insurgent violence (e.g., ULFA-Independent threat). Introducing more arms into civilian hands risks:
      • Propagating further violence.
      • Increased arms proliferation, making weapons more accessible.
      • Potential for weapons to enter grey markets or fall into "wrong hands."
  3. Administrative and Legal Challenges:
    1. Arms Act, 1959 & Arms Rules, 2016: These laws provide for restricted issuance of arms licenses to select individuals through a stringent process, primarily for self-preservation.
    2. Preclusion for Groups: The existing rules preclude the provision of such licenses to larger, identified groups due to:
      • Administrative complexity: Difficulties in licensing, monitoring, and recovering firearms.
      • Risk of Conflict: Identification of "eligible groups" itself could be fraught with conflict.
    3. Designating Authority: Arming civilian groups implicitly bestows an authority that could potentially backfire on the state itself.

III. Precedent and Supreme Court Intervention (Salwa Judum Case)

  1. Chhattisgarh Example: The policy draws parallels with the Salwa Judum campaign in Chhattisgarh (late 2000s), where security forces armed civilian groups to counter Maoist threats.

  2. Negative Outcomes: This policy led to:
    • Severe human rights violations.
    • Widespread lawlessness.
  3. Supreme Court Ruling: The Supreme Court of India intervened and declared the Salwa Judum policy illegal, underscoring the dangers of arming private militias or civilian groups.

IV. Alternatives and Recommendations

  1. Enhance State Law Enforcement: Instead of arming civilians, the clear alternative is for the State government to:

    • Enhance its own law enforcement and security presence in these "vulnerable areas."
    • Strengthen police infrastructure and intelligence gathering.
    • Improve policing practices to build trust with local communities.
  2. Focus on Developmental Solutions: Address underlying socio-economic issues that contribute to vulnerability and insecurity.
  3. Reverse the Decision: Given the inherent dangers and past precedents, critics strongly urge the Assam government to reverse its decision.
     

A Historical Overview of Assam : 

  1. Assam, India's easternmost sentinel, is a land of rich natural beauty, diverse topography (Brahmaputra & Barak river valleys, hills).
  2. And it is a unique synthesis of various races, tribes, and ethnic groups that have inhabited it since ancient times.

I. Etymological Origins of the Name 'Assam'

  1. Ancient Names:
    1. Pragjyotisha / Pragjyotishpura: Mentioned in epics (Mahabharata, Ramayana) and Puranas. Gait (1992) suggests "City of Eastern Astrology" (Prag - former/eastern, Jyotisha - star/astrology).
    2. Kamarupa: Referenced in literature and epigraphs.
      • Mythological Origin: Associated with the legend of Shiva burning Kamdev (Cupid) to ashes, who later regained his form ('rupa') at Nilachal hills (site of Kamakhya Temple). Hence, 'Kamarupa' (where Kama regained his form).
  2. Modern Name:
    1. The name 'Aham' or 'Asom' is believed to have been given by the Ahoms (who arrived in 1228 A.D.).
    2. The modern name 'Assam' is considered an Anglicization of 'Ahom' or 'Asom'.

II. Historical Eras of Assam

Assam's history is broadly divided into four distinct eras:

  1. A. Ancient Era (c. 4th Century onwards):
     
    1. Began with the mention of Kamarupa in Samudragupta's Allahabad Pillar inscription.
    2. Marked the establishment of the Kamarupa Kingdom.
  2. B. Medieval Era (c. 13th Century onwards):
    1. Began with attacks from the Bengal Sultanate (first by Bakhtiyar Khilji in 1206, mentioned in Kanai-boroxiboa rock inscription).
    2. Saw the breakup of the ancient kingdom and the rise of various medieval kingdoms and chieftain-ships.
    3. The Ahom Dynasty (1228-1826 AD):
      • Established by Sukaphaa, a Shan prince from Mong Mao, after crossing the Patkai Mountains.
      • Ruled for nearly 600 years, a glorious period of assimilation and administration.
      • Prominent tribal groups of the medieval period included Kacharis, Chutias, and Koch.
    4. End of Ahom Rule: Culminated with the Burmese invasion of Assam and subsequent annexation by the British East India Company following the Treaty of Yandaboo in 1826.
  3. C. Colonial Era (1826-1947):
    1. Commenced with British control after the Treaty of Yandaboo.
    2. Territorial Changes:
      • Cachar annexed in 1832.
      • Jaintia Hills annexed in 1835.
      • Became a separate province with Shillong as capital in 1874.
      • Sylhet (excluding Karimganj subdivision) ceded to Pakistan (East Pakistan, later Bangladesh) during Partition of India in 1947.
  4. D. Post-Colonial Era (1947-Present):
    1. Assam became a constituent state of India in 1950 after active participation in freedom movements.
    2. Further Territorial Reductions:
      • Dewangiri (North Kamrupa) ceded to Bhutan in 1951.
      • Formation of new states from within its borders: Meghalaya, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, and Mizoram.
    3. Capital Shift: From Shillong (now capital of Meghalaya) to Dispur (Guwahati suburb) in 1972.

III. Key Post-Independence Political Developments and Milestones

  1. Early Administration (1947-1957):
    1. First Governor: Sir Muhammad Saleh Akbar Hydari.
    2. First Chief Minister: Gopinath Bordoloi (1947-1950).
      • Witnessed establishment of: Gauhati University (1948), Gauhati High Court (1948), All India Radio (AIR) Guwahati station.
    3. Second Chief Minister: Bishnu Ram Medhi (1950-1957).
      • Initiated the First Five-Year Plan.
      • Introduced the Panchayat system.
      • Increased importance given to the agricultural sector.
  2. Bimla Prasad Chaliha (1957-1970):
    1. Significant Events:
      • 66th Session of Congress held at Jalukbari, Guwahati (1958).
      • Saraighat Bridge constructed over Brahmaputra (1965).
      • Oil refinery established at Noonmati, Guwahati (1962).
      • Language Revolt (1959-60): Led to Assamese becoming the official language of the state, with Bengali also recognized in Cachar District of Barak Valley.
  3. Mohendra Mohan Choudhury (1970-1972):
    1. Industrial Foundations: Bongaigaon Petro-Chemicals, Paper Mill at Jogighopa, and Jute factory at Silghat (Nagaon).
  4. Sarat Chandra Sinha (1972 onwards):
    1. Capital officially shifted to Dispur, Guwahati in 1974.

IV. The Assam Movement and Accord

  1. Assam Movement (1979-1985):
    1. Nature: Popular movement against illegal immigrants (primarily from Bangladesh).
    2. Leadership: Led by All Assam Students' Union (AASU) and All Assam Gana Sangram Parishad (AAGSP).
    3. Objective: Identify and expel illegal immigrants, and provide constitutional, legislative, and administrative safeguards for indigenous Assamese people.
    4. Characteristics: Largely non-violent protests and demonstrations.
    5. Tragic Incident: The Nellie massacre was a case of extreme violence during the agitation.
  2. Assam Accord (1985):
    1. Culmination: Signed on August 15, 1985, between representatives of the Government of India and AASU-AAGSP leaders.
    2. Nature: A Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) that formally ended the six-year agitation.
    3. Significance: A landmark agreement addressing the contentious issue of illegal immigration and safeguarding the rights of indigenous communities.

V. Contemporary Assam

  1. Area: 78,438 square kilometers.
  2. Districts: Consists of 33 districts.
  3. Population: Credited as the most populous state in Northeast India.


 

Also Read
FREE NIOS Books

UPSC Daily Current Affairs

UPSC Monthly Magazine

Previous Year Interview Questions

Free MCQs for UPSC Prelims

UPSC Test Series

ENSURE IAS NOTES

Our Booklist

Japan’s New AI Law: Promoting Innovation

Kerala High Court Allows Trans Couple as "Parents" on Birth Certificates

India Opens Doors to Foreign Law Firms