Board:- Sudan ma’am - 20 to 25 mins // Date and session of the interview:- 28 April, Last to go (afternoon session) // Optional:- Law // College:- Govt Law College // Profession (if any):- 1 yr. work ex. Ernst & Young // Hobbies:- Football, trekking
Chairperson: started with monologue that it’s a conversation and we can get something clarified if needed.
Q1. Q on undertrials - issues?
Q2. Recent remission of murder convict in Bihar case. My views on it?
Q3. Why women less in judiciary?
Q4. What was your experience in EY and why did you quit your job?
Member 1 (lady member, soft spoken, but listened patiently and nodded while answering):
Q1. Judicial pendency and what can be done about it?
Q2. Do judges deserve so many perks? What about vacations? Can something be done to reduce vacations?
Q3. Collegium issues?
Q4. ECI judgment by Supreme Court. My views? Should CJI be there in the committee?
Member 2:
Q1. Favourite football player?
Q2. Position I played (this Q was only asked because honourable panelist wanted to let me know he was a striker in his younger days :))
Q3. Can we set a hard deadline to resolve cases in courts?
Q4. Reforms as law secretary?
Q5. Why not become a judge? Why civil service?
Member 3:
Q1. view on aapla davakhana in Maharashtra
Q2. What Is contract farming? Did the farm laws cover it?
Q3. Issues faced by farmers?
Q4. NBS subsidy regime what is it?
Q5. Why India moving towards international trade in rupee?
Member 4:
Q1. Education health infra security which should be prioritized?
Q2. Football tactic that can be used by lawyers in arguing a case?
Candidate experience in the interview- Very cordial board. Mostly DAF based. 80% of Qs revolved around law/judiciary. Qs were long and somewhat mains oriented..