Q2.What was a key ideological difference between the Moderates and the Extremists in the Indian National Congress during the freedom struggle?
Answer: A [The Moderates believed in constitutional reforms while the Extremists aimed for Swaraj.]
Explanation:Option (a) is correct: The Moderates believed in achieving political change through constitutional reforms, petitions, and dialogue with the British, while the Extremists demanded Swaraj (complete self-rule) and supported mass mobilization, protests, and direct action. This reflects the core ideological divide in the Indian National Congress during the freedom struggle.
Option (b) is incorrect: While the Moderates did support some social reforms, their primary focus was on constitutional and political reforms rather than purely social issues. Similarly, Extremists did not emphasize economic independence as their main goal; they were primarily focused on attaining political self-rule and national awakening.
Option (c) is incorrect: This is factually reversed. Moderates did not seek immediate independence; they preferred gradual reform within British rule. Extremists did not aim to collaborate with the British; instead, they demanded complete self-rule and were willing to adopt confrontational methods to achieve it.
Option (d) is incorrect: Moderates were committed to nonviolent methods such as petitions and discussions, not armed struggle. Extremists, while more radical, did not reject nonviolence entirely, but they endorsed assertive mass mobilization, strikes, and protests, rather than promoting violent confrontation as a primary method.