Q2.With the development of Semi-Cryogenic Engines by ISRO, how do they differ from fully Cryogenic Engines?
- Semi-cryogenic engines use refined kerosene (RP-1) as fuel instead of liquid hydrogen, though both use liquid oxygen (LOX) as the oxidizer.
- Semi-cryogenic engines are generally more economical and easier to handle at ground level than fully cryogenic engines.
- Semi-cryogenic engines offer a higher specific impulse than liquid hydrogen-based cryogenic engines, making them more suitable for the uppermost stages of a rocket.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: A [1 and 2 only]
Explanation:Statement 1 is correct: Semi-cryogenic engines developed by Indian Space Research Organisation use refined kerosene (RP-1) as fuel and liquid oxygen (LOX) as the oxidiser. Fully cryogenic engines, in contrast, use liquid hydrogen (LH₂) with LOX.
Statement 2 is correct: Semi-cryogenic engines are more economical, denser-fuel based, and easier to store and handle at ground level compared to hydrogen-based cryogenic engines, which require extremely low temperatures and complex insulation.
Statement 3 is incorrect: Liquid hydrogen–based cryogenic engines provide a higher specific impulse (Isp) than kerosene-based semi-cryogenic engines. Hence, fully cryogenic engines are better suited for upper stages, not semi-cryogenic ones.